|
|
|
| The influence of field of view on radiation dose and resolution of digital substraction angiography |
| WEI Chao1, DU Peng2, ZAHNG Wenyi1, GAO Jie1, WU Quan1 |
1. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Institute of Radiation Medicine, Tianjin 300192 China;
2. Jinan Institute of Measurement and Verification |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the influence of incident screen size on the representative and maximum value of air kerma rate of perspective body surface, air kerma rate of image receptor front screen, spatial resolution and low contrast resolution, by testing 9 philips Allura Xper FD 20 digital subtraction angiography systems. Methods We tested the indexes of the nine radiography unit with the Specification for testing of quality control in medical X-ray diagnostic Equipment (WS 76-2017). The data were collected under auto exposure in perspective mode with the bed 100 cm far away from the ground, and image receiver 30 cm far away from the bed surface, moreover phantom and surveying instrument located at the center of radiation field. All data were analysed by SPSS 23.0. Data were done by Tamhane'T2 test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Pearson correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis. The difference was statistically significant by P<0.05. Results The experimental results of the nine units showed that, reducing the field of view of digital subtraction angiography could significantly improve spatial resolution and low contrast resolution, and increase the representative value of air kerma rate of perspective body surface and air kerma rate of image receptor front screen, but had no effect on the maximum value of air kerma rate of perspective body surface. Conclusion In this study, we found that changing the field of view of digital subtraction angiography could cause the influence of incident screen size on the representative value of air kerma rate of perspective body surface, air kerma rate of image receptor front screen, spatial resolution and low contrast resolution. And that result was closely related to the changes of kV and mA caused by FOV of digital subtraction angiography.
|
|
Received: 02 July 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张云轩,张鹤,信亚周,等.螺旋CT低剂量扫描对肺结核病情监测的应用价值[J].中国辐射卫生,2019,28(1):95-97.
[2] 胡小素,苏垠平,陈丽娟,等.骨科医生术中经皮椎体强化术辐射防护及风险认知的研究[J].中国辐射卫生,2019,28(1):33-35.
[3] 方主亭,唐仪,吴少杰,等.介入治疗在胰十二指肠切除术后出血的临床应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2019,28(3):292-295.
[4] 杨净松,陈超, 赵卫,等.基底动脉穿支动脉显微解剖与DSA研究[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(11):1068-1071.
[5] 刘鹤飞,田庆华,易飞,等.经皮骨成形术在骨盆骨转移瘤治疗中的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2018,27(10):936-940.
[6] Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured in tracranial aneurysms:a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures,rebleeding,subgroups,and aneurysm occlusion[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366(9488):809-817.
[7] MacDonald D, Chan A, Harris A, et a1. Diagnosis and managent of calcified carotid artery atheroma:dental perspectives[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2012, 114(4):533-47.
[8] Kan P, Mokin M, Dumont TM, et al. Cervical carotid artery stenosis:latest update on diagnosis and management[J].Curr Probl Cardiol, 2012, 37(4):127-169.
[9] EUROPEAN COMMISSION. RADIATION PROTECTION NO 149[S]. EU Scientific Seminar 2003"Medical Overexposures".
[10] 魏超,高杰,张文艺,等.2016年天津市部分区医用X射线摄影机质量控制状态检测结果与分析[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志,2018, 42(3):257-260.
[11] 张红.某医院数字减影血管造影机放射防护检测和影像质量控制检测与评价[J].实用医技杂志, 2017, 24(5):525-526.
[12] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 76-2017医用常规X射线诊断设备质量控制检测规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[13] 王琳.大型数字化平板DSA设备技术新进展[J].社区医学杂志,2012,10(10):53-54.
[14] Meriç N, Yüce UR, Ilgit ET. Radiation dose in balloon dacryocystoplasty:a study using Rando phantoms and thermoluminescent dosimetry[J]. Diagn Interv Radio,2005,11(3):166-169.PMID:16206060.
[15] 陈睿,凤志慧.毫安秒对SPECT/CT检查中辐射剂量和影像质量影响的研究[J].中国辐射卫生,2019,28(1):43-46.
[16] 戴工华,马承军,姚杰,等.不同附加滤过与管电压和管电流组合对小儿床边X射线摄影图像质量和辐射剂量的影[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2019,39(1):31-36. |
|
|
|
