|
|
|
| Comparative analysis of air absorbed dose rate with different gamma radiation dose rate instrument |
| CAO Longsheng, DIN Xun, YANG Yang, ZENG Lei, HU Chenjian, LVU Anbiao, LIAO Yuhang |
| Zhe Jiang Province Environmental Radiation Monitoring Center, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Radiation Monitoring, Zhe Jiang Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Radiation Safety Monitoring, Hangzhou 310012 China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective In order to test and improve the monitoring technical level and ability of radiation environmental monitoring network in Zhejiang Province, ensure the accuracy and reliability of monitoring data and information, and obtain the cosmic ray response values of instruments and equipment in this year. Methods In September 2018，an intercomparison meeting of environmental gamma radiation air absorbed dose rate within the radiation environmental monitoring network of Zhejiang province was held in Ningbo，which was organized by Zhejiang Province Radiation Environmental Monitoring Center.A total of 33 sets of instruments from 15 member units participated in the intercomparison measurements at 5 environmental measuring points, and the comparison results were evaluated by the Z score values. Results It was found that the |Z| of all measurement results were less than or equal to 2, and the evaluation results were satisfactory and acceptable. Conclusion The measured data of scintillation counters have relatively wider dispersion，and the high pressure ionization chambers have bigger response valuetocosmic ray. The measurement results of the two kinds of instruments keep a good linearity except for the measurement points of cosmic ray response.
|
|
Received: 24 August 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张瑜, 杨维耿, 陈啸炯, 等. 部分仪器对宇宙射线响应的测定[J]. 核电子学与探测技术,2013,33(12):1507-1510. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0934.2013.12.018
Zhang Y, Yang WG, Chen XJ, et al. Determination of the response of some instruments to cosmic ray[J]. Nucl Electron Detect Technol, 2013, 33(12): 1507-1510. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0934.2013.12.018
[2] 郑国文, 陈凌. 宇宙射线剂量率随海拔变化规律研究[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2017,26(2):142-144. DOI: 10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714X.2017.02.004
Zheng GW, Chen L. Study on the changing rule of cosmic-ray dose rate varies with altitude[J]. Chin J Radiol Health, 2017, 26(2): 142-144. DOI: 10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714X.2017.02.004
[3] 宋海青, 张伟珠、廖建华, 等. 高压电离室宇宙射线响应因子测量[J]. 辐射防护通讯,2017,37(1):32-35. DOI: CNKI:SUN:DEFE.0.2017-01-008
Song HQ, Zhang WZ, Liao JH, et al. Cosmic ray response factor measurement for high pressure ionization chambers[J]. Radiat Prot Bull, 2017, 37(1): 32-35. DOI: CNKI:SUN:DEFE.0.2017-01-008
[4] 生态环境部. 2019全国辐射环境质量报告[EB/OL]. (2020-08-09)[2020-09-13]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/hjzlqt/hyfshj/202008/P020200809561669637371.pdf.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Report of the national radiation environmentin 2019[EB/OL]. (2020-08-09)[2020-09-13]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/hjzlqt/hyfshj/202008/P020200809561669637371.pdf.
[5] 国家环境保护局. GB/T 14853—1993环境地表γ辐射剂量率测定规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
State Environmental Protection Administration. GB/T 14853—1993Norm for the measurement of environmental terrestrial gamma-radiation dose rate[S]. Beijing: Standard Press of China, 2003.
[6] 任天山, 林莲卿, 陈志鹏, 等. 宇宙射线电离量的测定和几种探测器对宇宙射线的响应[J]. 辐射防护,1987,7(3):185-190. DOI: CNKI:SUN:FSFH.0.1987-03-003
Ren TS, Lin LQ, Chen ZP, et al. Determination of cosmic ray ionization rate at sea level and the responses of some dosemeters to cosmic ray[J]. Radia Prot, 1987, 7(3): 185-190. DOI: CNKI:SUN:FSFH.0.1987-03-003
[7] 金花, 岳清宇. 中国大陆地区居民所受宇宙射线剂量估算[J]. 原子能科学技术,1989,23(6):9-15
Jin H, Yue QY. The estimation of the dose from cosmic radiation received by the population living at mainland areas in China[J]. At Energy Sci Technol, 1989, 23(6): 9-15
[8] 王桂花, 秦欢, 李晓恒, 等. X-γ剂量率仪对宇宙射线响应的测量研究[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2019,28(2):166-167, 170. DOI: 10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2019.02.013
Wang GH, Qin H, Li XH, et al. The study of measurement of cosmic ray response by X-γ dosimeter[J]. Chin J Radiol Health, 2019, 28(2): 166-167, 170. DOI: 10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2019.02.013
[9] 宫增艳, 赵广翠, 李雪贞, 等. 不同方法监测环境γ辐射剂量率的结果比较与分析[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2018,27(1):69-73. DOI: 10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714X.2018.01.018
Gong ZY, Zhao GC, Li XZ, et al. Comparison and analysis of environmental γ-radiation levels by using different monitoring methods[J]. Chin J Radiol Health, 2018, 27(1): 69-73. DOI: 10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714X.2018.01.018
[10] 中华人民共和国卫生部. GBZ/T 144—2002用于光子外照射放射防护的剂量转换系数[S]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2002.
Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. GBZ/T 144—2002Dose conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against photon external radiation[S]. Beijing: Law Press, 2002.
[11] 吴昱城, 胡丹, 赵顺平, 等. 全国辐射环境监测网络环境γ辐射剂量率测量比对[J]. 辐射防护通讯,2016,36(1):1-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6356.2016.01.001
Wu YC, Hu D, Zhao SP, et al. Intercomparison of environmental gamma radiation dose rate measurements within the national radiation environmental monitoring network of China[J]. Radiat Prot Bull, 2016, 36(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6356.2016.01.001
[12] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. GB/T 27043—2012合格评定能力验证的通用要求[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. GB/T 27043—2012Conformity assessment—General requirements for proficiency testing[S]. Beijing: Standard Press of China, 2013.
[13] 能力验证结果的统计处理和能力评价指南. CNAS—GL02: 2014[S]. 中国合格评定国家认可委员会, 2014。.
Guidance on statistic treatment of proficiency testing results and performance evaluation. CNAS—GL02: 2014[S]. China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment, 2014.
[14] 王欣欣, 于美香, 王桂花. 山东省2018年γ辐射剂量率测量比对结果分析[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2019,28(3):303-306. DOI: 10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2019.03.023
Wang XX, Yu MX, Wang GH. Analysis of comparison results of γ-radiation dose rate measurement in Shandong Province in 2018[J]. Chin J Radiol Health, 2019, 28(3): 303-306. DOI: 10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2019.03.023
|
|
|
|
