|
|
|
| Study on the distribution characteristics of aerosol produced by powder dumping in glove box |
| ZHOU Yanling, LUO Zhiping, BI Yuanjie, GUO Jinsen, WANG Huan |
| China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413 China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of particle size, wind speed and dumping velocity on aerosol concentration distribution during powder dumping in a reprocessing plant.Methods CeO2 powder was selected as the substitute material of PuO2. FLUENT software was used to calculate the pouring process of CeO2 powder under different operation conditions. Then the aerosol concentration distribution under different dumping speeds was measured by particle size spectrometer to verify the accuracy of simulation results.Results The particles with small particle size are more likely to be separated from the mainstream area by the drag force of the surrounding gas, and the radius of the diffusion range also increases with the decrease of the particle size. 2) When the ventilation speed is less than 1 m/s, the dust lifting can be reduced and the concentration of dust particles in the chamber can be reduced to a certain extent. 3) In the process of powder dumping, the spoon is rotated anticlockwise at a speed of 100° in 2～3 s, and less dust aerosol is produced on the right side of the tray.Conclusion When operating the powder particles with smaller particle size, more attention should be paid to the monitoring of aerosol at different positions; the change of air inlet velocity makes the flow field in glove box more complex, and the volume fraction of dust particles is related to the size and location of vortex formed by airflow. The greater the wind speed, the greater the impact on the powder dumping process. The experimental results are basically consistent with the simulation results, and the results show that the lower the dumping speed, the smaller the aerosol concentration near the tray.
|
|
Received: 01 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 孔玉侠, 崔力萌, 王欢, 等. 北京市大气气溶胶总α、总β放射性测量与分析[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2019,28(5):513-516. DOI: 10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2019.05.011
Kong YX, Cui LM, Wang H, et al. Measurement and analysis of gross alpha and beta radioactivity of atmospheric aerosols in Beijing[J]. Chin J Radiol Health, 2019, 28(5): 513-516. DOI: 10.13491/j.issn.1004-714X.2019.05.011
[2] 赵艳芳, 楚彩芳, 张钦富, 等. 浅析核电站职业病危害因素种类与来源[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2016,25(3):372-375. DOI: 10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714X.2016.03.041
Zhao YF, Chu CF, Zhang QF, et al. Types and sources of occupational hazards in nuclear power plant[J]. Chin J Radiol Health, 2016, 25(3): 372-375. DOI: 10.13491/j.cnki.issn.1004-714X.2016.03.041
[3] 高红武. 室内空气中可吸入颗粒物的监测与研究[J]. 云南冶金,2006,35(3):75-77, 96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0308.2006.03.020
Gao HW. Monitoring and studying the inhalable particulate matter in indoor air[J]. Yunnan Metall, 2006, 35(3): 75-77, 96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0308.2006.03.020
[4] 国防科学技术工业委员会. EJ/T 1108—2001 密封箱室设计原则[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2001.
National Defense Science, Technology and Industry Commission. EJ/T 1108-2001 Design principles for containment enclosures[S].Beijing:Standard Press of China,2001.
[5] 叶涛. FLUENT软件在粉体颗粒混合领域中的应用[J]. 中国粉体技术,2009,15(3):73-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5548.2009.03.020
Ye T. Application of FLUENT code in powder mixing field[J]. China Powder Sci Technol, 2009, 15(3): 73-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5548.2009.03.020
[6] 李鹏飞, 徐敏义, 王飞飞. 精通CFD工程仿真与案例实战[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2017: 5-8.
Li PF, Xu MY, Wang FF. Proficient proficiency in CFD engineering simulation and case practice[M]. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press, 2017: 5-8.
[7] Kuang SB, Qi Z, Yu AB, et al. CFD modeling and analysis of the multiphase flow and performance of dense medium cyclones[J]. Miner Eng, 2014, 62: 43-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.10.012
[8] 娄春景. 基于CFD的缓冲罐粉料逸出研究[J]. 中国海洋平台,2016,31(6):68-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4500.2016.06.011
Lou CJ. Research of particle escaping of bulk cement surge tank based on CFD[J]. China Offshore Platf, 2016, 31(6): 68-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4500.2016.06.011
[9] 王杰, 叶长青, 孟祥玮. 沙尘试验箱内部流场的数值仿真与分析[J]. 检验检疫学刊,2016,26(6):21-24. DOI: CNKI:SUN:XDSJ.0.2016-06-006
Wang J, Ye CQ, Meng XW. The stimulation and analysis of the gas-solid two-phase flow in dust and sand test chamber[J]. J Insp Quar, 2016, 26(6): 21-24. DOI: CNKI:SUN:XDSJ.0.2016-06-006
[10] 毛娅, 陈家乐, 陈作炳, 等. 采用拉格朗日法与欧拉法模拟旋风筒内气固两相流的对比研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报,2017,36(2):459-465. DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2017.02.008
Mao Y, Chen JL, Chen ZB, et al. Comparative study on cyclone gas-solid two-phase flow using Lagrange method and Euler method[J]. Bull Chin Ceram Soc, 2017, 36(2): 459-465. DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2017.02.008
|
| [1] |
. [J]. , 2017, 26(1): 88-91. |
|
|
|
|
