|
|
|
| Analysis of “Specifications for testing of quality control in X and γ ray stereotactic radiotherapy system”(WS 582—2017) tracking evaluation results |
| HU Chuanpeng1, HUANG Weixu2, ZHAI Hezheng3, LI Hailiang4, ZHANG Lei1, JIA Chenzhi1, CHENG Xiaojun1 |
1. Henan Institute for Occupational Medicine, Zhengzhou 450052 China;
2. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment;
3. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine;
4. Institute of Radiation Medicine Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To understand the problems in the use of the standard named specifications for testing of quality control in X and γ ray stereotactic radiotherapy system(WS 582—2017), and evaluate the scientificity, rationality, applicability and operability of the standard, so as to put forward reasonable suggestions for further improving.Methods According to WS/T 536—2017, the standard was tracked and evaluated by questionnaire and field survey, and then the recovered questionnaire were reviewed and the label was corrected, At last the data was input by Excel office and the statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS 13.0.Results All units using the standard were aware of the release of the standard. The training rate of technical service institutions、manufacturers、supervision institutions and medical institutions were 71.9%、85.7%、33.3% and 43.5%, respectively. The familiarity rate of technical service institutions、manufacturers、supervision institutions and medical institutions with the standard content were 71.7%、68.1%、18.5% and 54.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, all the respondents did not grasp the chapter of X-knife, and more than half of the respondents thought that the standard test methods were feasible and practical.Conclusion The users had a high degree of recognition for the coordination of standards; The practicability of the standard and the operability of the detection method were generally recognized. Meanwhile, In the future the publicity and training efforts need to be improved, and some testing indexes and methods need examples and explanation
|
|
Received: 13 January 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中华人民共和国卫生部. GBZ 168—2005 X、γ射线头部立体定向外科治疗放射卫生防护标准[S]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006.
[2] 中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 582—2017 X、γ射线立体定向放射治疗系统质量控制检测规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[3] 中华人民共和国卫生部. WS/T 536—2017卫生标准跟踪评价工作指南[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[4] 中国疾病预防控制中心.中国疾控中心关于征集2019年度公共卫生标准实施评估项目承担单位的通知[Z]. 2018.
[5] 程婉秋. 关于卫生标准追踪评价的几点思考[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2013,4(Z7):64-66
[6] 方道奎, 余淑苑, 彭朝琼. 我国卫生标准实施评估工作开展情况概述[J]. 中国卫生产业,2019,16(29):194-195, 198
[7] 鞠金欣, 薛茹, 陈尔东. 放射卫生标准编写常见问题解析[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2019,28(3):337-340
[8] 薛茹, 鞠金欣, 陈尔东. 医疗照射防护中有关放射诊断的放射卫生标准现状分析[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2019,28(3):262-266
[9] 戎艳, 阮艳君, 孙道远. 职业卫生标准应用情况追踪评价方法探讨及应用举例[C]//第十三次全国劳动卫生与职业病学术会议论文汇编, 2014, 70-71.
[10] 敖翔. 伽玛刀立体定向放射外科的质量保证和质量控制[J]. 医疗装备,2018,31(11):199-200
|
| [1] |
ZHANG Zhao, HE Ling, MA Kui, ZHANG Yimei, ZHAO Fengling, SON Yu, LIU Yulong, YANG Yuhua, WU Liya, BIAN Huahui, XIANG Junyi, BI Jinling, ZHU Jun, GAO Yiying, ZUO Yun, YANG Li. Health standards tracking evaluation on “General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases” (GBZ 112—2017)[J]. , 2020, 29(2): 99-103. |
|
|
|
|
