|
|
|
| Health standards tracking evaluation on “General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases” (GBZ 112—2017) |
| ZHANG Zhao1, HE Ling1, MA Kui2, ZHANG Yimei3, ZHAO Fengling4, SON Yu5, LIU Yulong6, YANG Yuhua7, WU Liya8, BIAN Huahui6, XIANG Junyi9, BI Jinling10, ZHU Jun1, GAO Yiying1, ZUO Yun1, YANG Li1 |
1. Sichuan Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention,Chengdu 610041 China;
2. Hubei Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention;
3. Jiansu Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention;
4. Henan Institute of Occupational Medicine;
5. Sichuan Provincial Science City Hospital;
6. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University;
7. Guangdong Institute of Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Disease;
8. Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region;
9. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University;
10. Hefei Second People's Hospital |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To understand the application of health standards in the "General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases" (GBZ 112—2017), and to provide basis for revision, publicity and standardization of the standards.Methods Aiming at the of propaganda, implementation, quality and efficiency, statistical analysis was performed by using questionnaires.Investigation was carried out to track the implementation status and effect of evaluation GBZ 112—2017 among occupational disease diagnostic institutions, occupational disease diagnostic physicians, health administrative supervisors and radiation workers in eight provinces and one group.for tracking the implementation status and effect of evaluation GBZ 112—2017.Results A total of 21 occupational disease diagnostic institutions, 93 occupational disease diagnostic physicians, 70 health administrative supervisors and 1329 radiation workers were measured. 85.7% of diagnostic institutions had established a learning system of diagnostic criteria, 57.1% of which were equipped with standard training funds for diagnostic physicians. The standard awareness rate was 75.6%～80% and the standard training rate was 48.4%～55.7%. The adoption rate of standard was 0. 42.9% and 48% of the diagnosis institutions have the ability of physical dose estimation and biological dose estimation respectively, and only 42.9% of the diagnosis institutions owned both of them at the same time; The probability of judging 11 items of standard is 90%～97%, the consistency of approved standard with laws and regulations was 95%～97%, and the satisfaction of standard is 86%～87.1%.Conclusion Through tracing the evaluation of health standards, the study provides objective basis for the revision, publicity and management of health standards of general principles for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases.
|
|
Received: 22 October 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 全国人民代表常务委员会. 中华人民共和国主席令第81号中华人民共和国职业病防治法[Z].2017.
[2] 国家卫生计生委法制司. 卫生部令第91号职业病诊断与鉴定管理办法[Z].2013.
[3] 国家卫生计生委等四部门. 国卫疾控发[2013] 48号关于印发《职业病分类和目录》的通知[Z].2013.
[4] 胡世杰, 黄永顺, 夏丽华. 职业病诊断标准溯及力探讨[J]. 中国职业医学,2017,44(3):285-289
[5] 陈尔东, 鞠金欣, 薛茹. 我国放射卫生标准体系的结构探讨[J]. 环境与职业医学,2016,33(3):274-277
[6] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GBZ 112—2017职业性放射性疾病诊断总则[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS/T 536—2017卫生标准跟踪评价工作指南[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[8] 戎艳, 张巧耘, 阮艳君, 等. 《职业健康监护技术规范》应用情况评价方法研究[J]. 环境与职业医学,2014,31(2):138-142
|
|
|
|
