|
|
|
| Follow-up investigation of “General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases”(GBZ 112—2017) among diagnostic physicians in some provinces and cities of China |
| MA Kui1, XIA Ying1, HE Ling2, ZHANG Zhao2, LIU Yulong3, BIAN Huahui3, ZHAO Fengling4, SONG Yu5, ZHANG Yimei6, YANG Yuhua7, WU Liya8, XIANG Junyi9, BI Jinling10, ZHU Jun2, GAO Yiying2, ZUO Yun2, YANG Li2 |
1. Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079 China;
2. Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
3. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University;
4. Henan Institute of Occupational Medicine;
5. Sichuan Provincial Science City Hospital;
6. Jiangsu Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention;
7. Guangdong Institute of Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Disease;
8. Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region;
9. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University;
10. Hefei Second People's Hospital |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective Through a questionnaire survey on the popularization of "General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases" (GBZ 112—2017) among diagnostic physicians in some parts of the country, the study aims to understand the mastery and implementation of the standard, collect and analyze the existing problems in the implementation of the standard. The research will provide the basis for the revision of the standard. Methods By means of literature collection, questionnaire and comparative analysis, a total of 93 doctors with diagnostic qualifications for occupational radioactive diseases in 21 diagnostic institutions were investigated to collect and analyze the evaluation information of the "General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases" (GBZ 112—2017). The study objects used to work in Sichuan, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Hubei, Henan, Xinjiang, Anhui and the nuclear industry system, namely, the "Seven provinces and one Group".Results The survey showed that the feasible rate of 11 articles in the text of the "General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases"(GBZ 112—2017) was 89.3%～95.7%, 10 items were more than 90.0%, the range of partial feasible rate was 0%～5.4%, the range of unfeasible rate was 3.2%～5.4%, 80.0% of the diagnostic doctors did not give specific opinions on the standard, and 94.6% of the diagnostic doctors approved the consistency of standard laws and regulations.Conclusion The standard of the "General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases" (GBZ 112—2017) is in good condition, but a few of the provisions should be amended properly, and the propaganda and implementation of the standard should be further strengthened.
|
|
Received: 22 October 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郑钧正. 必须切实强化放射诊疗的安全防护[J]. 医学研究杂志,2011,40(2):3-5
[2] 傅颖华, 杜维霞, 孙全富, 等. 我国放射工作人员职业健康管理现状及其问题[J]. 中国职业医学,2008,35(1):44-46
[3] 李小亮, 苏垠平, 雷淑洁, 等. 2013—2017年我国职业性放射性疾病诊断情况分析[J]. 中国放射医学与防护杂志,2018,38(10):779-783
|
| [1] |
ZHANG Zhao, HE Ling, MA Kui, ZHANG Yimei, ZHAO Fengling, SON Yu, LIU Yulong, YANG Yuhua, WU Liya, BIAN Huahui, XIANG Junyi, BI Jinling, ZHU Jun, GAO Yiying, ZUO Yun, YANG Li. Health standards tracking evaluation on “General guideline for diagnosis of occupational radiation diseases” (GBZ 112—2017)[J]. , 2020, 29(2): 99-103. |
|
|
|
|
