|
|
|
| Analysis of the intercomparison results of radiation environment monitoring instrument of Shandong Province in 2017 |
| WANG Guihua1, YU Meixiang2, WANG Xinxin1 |
1. Shandong Nuclear and Radiation Safety Monitoring Center, Jinan 250117 China;
2. Shandong Province Radiation Environmental Management Station |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To grasp the situations of equipment and calibration practice of the radiation monitoring agencies in the province by organizing an intercomparison practice, and to improve the monitoring level and ability to ensure the reliability of monitoring data.Methods The quadrant Z-score was used to evaluate the results of ionizing radiation (Gamma dose rate). The results of synthesizing field intensity, electric field and magnetic field of power frequency were evaluated by calculating the relative percentage.Results 50 out of the 51 measurements of ambient gamma dose rate were acceptable, only one was problematic. Except for a result of power frequency magnetic field with a relative deviation of 30.2%, the deviations of other results were all less than 20%.Conclusion The intercomparison practice reflects the current level of radiation environment monitoring in the whole province, the monitoring capability of few agencies needs to be improved.
|
|
Received: 06 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 于美香,袁国玉,王昆.山东省2015年γ辐射剂量率监测仪器比对结果分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2016,25(4):490-494.
[2] 于美香,袁国玉,王昆.山东省2014年电磁环境监测仪器比对结果分析[J].中国辐射卫生.2015,24(5):547-549.
[3] 国家环境保护局.GB/T 14583-1993环境地表γ辐射剂量率测定规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1993.
[4] CNAS-GL02,能力验证结果的的统计处理和能力评价指南[Z].2014.
[5] 徐国勇,陈青松,赖明珍,等.40台工频电场测量仪器实验室间比对研究[J].环境与职业医学,2017,(7):593-597.
[6] 黄苑君.2015-2016广东省地级市环境监测仪器的宇宙射线响应测量比对报告[J].资源节约与环保,2017,(8):43-45. |
|
|
|
