|
|
Analysis of DR ranging error |
LIU Pan |
Fujian Center for Prevention and Control of Occupational Diseases and Chemical Poisoning, Fuzhou 350025 China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the results of ranging error detection and discuss its influencing factors, so as to control the imaging link of DR detector.Methods Referring to “the medical digital X-ray photography (DR) system quality control test specification ”(WS 521—2017), the DR ranging error detection results were processed. Meanwhile, DR equipments from the same manufacturer were selected for horizontal comparison and those from different manufacturers for vertical comparison.Results The overall qualification rate of DR ranging error was not high, with an average qualification rate of 63.6%. The qualification rate reached 100% after ranging correction.Conclusion Further refinement of detection methods and reduction of data acquisition errors can effectively improve the qualification rate of ranging errors, which is of great significance to medical X-ray image diagnosis.
|
Received: 26 July 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王一舟, 杨宝珍, 刘会善. 西门子DR平板探测器的校正[J]. 医疗卫生装备,2013,34(2):143 [2] 徐克, 韩萍. 医学影像学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015. [3] 祁建伟, 谢松城. 数字X射线摄影探测器技术的比较[J]. 生物医学工程与临床,2001,5(2):103-105 [4] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员. WS 521—2017 医用数字X射线摄影(DR)系统质量控制检测规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. [5] 医用辐射防护与质量控制. 第九届中国医疗设备行业数据“金人奖”[EB/OL]. [2019-10-22]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/-0xoJF_DKyit1Vl2W0MCLg [6] 王鹏程. 数字化X线影像检查技术成像质量与X线照射水平的研究[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2006. [7] 张泽宝. 医学影像物理学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2000. [8] 赵帅, 魏东波, 张立凯. 微焦点X射线源成像质量分析与研究[C]//全国射线数字成像与CT新技术研讨会论文集. 上海, 2009: 51-58. [9] 顾帮忠. 基于CCD的DR影像校正[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015. [10] 闵吉磊, 危荃, 敖波, 等. 非晶硅平板探测器DR成像校正方法[J]. 失效分析与预防,2015,10(3):133-138 [11] 魏召阳, 杨叶中, 王志刚. 某医院1台新装DR设备验收检测结果分析与探讨[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2017,26(1):63-65 [12] 池文辉. DR平板探测器的原理及维修[J]. 医疗装备,2017,30(14):75-76 [13] 程希元, 廖炎鹏, 刘书朋, 等. 38家医疗机构建设项目放射性职业病危害控制效果评价结果分析与探讨[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2018,27(3):246-251
|
[1] |
ZHAI Hezheng, ZHANG Jin, WU Xiangjun, YIN Handong, WANG Xin, WANG Manyao, HUANG Ziqi, WU Quan. Image quality test and analysis based on MAGNETOM Skyra magnetic resonance (MRI) equipment[J]. , 2020, 29(3): 236-240,245. |
|
|
|
|