|
|
|
| Analysis of occupational health examination and occupational disease diagnosis institutions in Shandong Province in 2017 |
| LIN Geng1,2, WANG Lei1,2, ZHANG Lingshuo1,2, MA Yinghua1, SHAO Hua1 |
1. Shandong Academy of Occupational Health and Occupational Medicine, Jinan 250062 China;
2. School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective Find out the current situation of occupational health examination and occupational disease diagnosis institutions in Shandong Province, and provide reference for the implementation of the Shandong Province Occupational Disease Prevention and Control Regulations (2017-2020). Methods The database was established using Excel2010, and the statistical data of the statistical declarations of occupational health examinations and occupational disease prevention agencies in various cities in 2017 were statistically analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software. Results There are 26 occupational disease diagnosis institutions in Shandong Province, including 2 centers for disease control, 10 occupational disease prevention hospitals, 13 hospitals and 1 private institution. There are 183 occupational health examination institutions, including 71 centers for disease control and prevention, 11 occupational disease prevention and treatment centers, 94 hospitals, 19 private institutions and 3 other institutions. Among the 17 districts and cities in the province, the top 5 institutions are Qingdao (20), Weifang (19), Dongying (18), Yantai (16), and Linyi (15). Among the institutions of occupational health examination and occupational disease diagnosis in Shandong Province, there are 545 physicians with occupational disease diagnosis qualifications and 1,062 occupational health examination physicians. Conclusion The network of occupational health examination and occupational disease diagnosis institutions in Shandong Province has been basically formed, but the distribution of occupational health examination institutions is uneven and the coverage of institutional examination software systems is relatively low. The number and quality of occupational health examination and occupational disease diagnosis institutions are far from the requirements set by the state.
|
|
Received: 13 November 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 佚名.山东省人民政府办公厅关于印发山东省职业病防治规划(2017-2020年)的通知政办发[2017]65号[J]. 山东省人民政府公报, 2017(29):16-25.
[2] 丁宛琼,徐涛, 林志敏,等.四川省县级职业健康监护机构现状与发展前景探讨[J].预防医学情报杂志, 2010, 26(10):800-802.
[3] 冯伟英,黄清,汪严华,等.浙江省职业健康检查和职业病诊断机构现状调查[J].预防医学, 2011, 23(3):63-65.
[4] Nicholson P J. Occupational health services in the UK-challenges and opportunities[J]. Occup Med, 2004, 54(3):147-152.
[5] Okubo T. Recent State and Future Scope of Occupational Health in Japan[J]. Sangyo Igaku, 1998, 40(2):161-167.
[6] 程希元,廖炎鹏,刘书朋,等.38家医疗机构建设项目放射性职业病危害控制效果评价结果分析与探讨[J].中国辐射卫生,2018,27(3):246-251.
[7] 李长松,刘洪强,单永乐,等.某采油厂修井作业职业病危害调查与评价[J].中国辐射卫生,2018,27(2):168-172.
[8] 余晨,于海涛,孙全富,等.全国放射卫生机构基本状况分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2014, 23(2):125-129.
[9] 袁伟明,傅红,张美辨,等.国外五种职业危害风险评估模型在某电镀企业的应用[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2014,(12):965-967.
[10] 王合迅.某医院CT职业病危害控制效果放射防护评价[J].中国辐射卫生,2017,26(5):591-592.
[11] 曹磊,徐晓虹,彭红, 等.论完善防护标准体系对职业性放射危害防治的支撑作用[J].中国辐射卫生,2017,26(5):568-574. |
|
|
|
