|
|
Research on the thickness of fovea in macular area in nuclear personnel |
ZHAO Yuling1, LIU Shufeng1, MA Dexun2, YU Fengqi2, YAO Yebao2, DONG xin2 |
1. Qingdao Sanitarium of the PLA Navy, Qingdao 266071 China; 2. No. 971 Hospital of the PLA Navy |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the difference of thickness of macular area between personnel with special nuclear involvement and those without nuclear involvement.Method During the annual physical examination, the Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination was added to measure the thickness of the macular area for personnel with special nuclear involvement and those without nuclear involvement in the general environment. Each person should take three times of measurements, and 204 nuclear personnel with odd numbers and 105 non-nuclear personnel were randomly selected according to the number at the end of the physical examination form. We took the average of the 3 times of measurements for comparison.Results The mean age of nuclear-related personnel and non-nuclear-related personnel was aged (29.40 ±6.16) and (28.92 ±6.71), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant, P = 0.5325. Mean visual acuity of the two groups: nuclear-related personnel was (1.04 ±0.03)(R), (1.05 ±0.03)(L), non-nuclear-related personnel was (1.00 ±0.05)(R), (1.02 ±0.05)(L), P = 0.5006(R), P = 0.5962(L). There was no significant difference in visual acuity between the two groups. Mean thickness in the macular area of nuclear-related personnel: (212.9 ±1.3) μm(R), (205.5 ±1.1) μm(L), P < 0.0001, the difference was statistically significant. Mean thickness in the macular area of non-nuclear-related personnel: (223.2 ±2.5) μm(R), (211.7 ±2.4) μm(L), P < 0.0001, the difference was also statistically significant. The differences of mean thickness of macular area of nuclear-related personnel and non-nuclear-related personnel were statistically significant, P = 0.0003(R), P = 0.0217(L).Conclusion The thickness of the macular area of non-nuclear-related personnel is thicker than that of nuclear-related personnel. It may be related to the excessive use of LED light sources in the special working environment of nuclear-related personnel. Other factors include nuclear, air pressure, oxygen partial pressure and the psychological state of the human being, which need to be proved by more detailed experiments.
|
Received: 06 January 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘晓峰, 王额尔敦, 阎少波, 等. 核潜艇远航艇员心理健康状况调查与分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志,2016,34(3):396-397, 423 [2] 强显成, 夏玉军, 王额尔敦. 长航潜艇环境下人动脉血气指标的变化研究[J]. 实用医药杂志,2016,33(2):97-98, 104 [3] 纪红. 核潜艇艇员心电图分析[J]. 实用医药杂志,2016,33(5):389-390 [4] Howard W R, Wong B, Yeager K S B, et al. Submarine exposure guideline recommendations for carbon dioxide based on the prenatal developmental effects of exposure in rats[J]. Birth Defects Res, 2019, 111(1): 26-33 [5] 于芝华. 核潜艇艇员核应激心理及医学对策[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2014,23(3):235-236 [6] Azizova T V, Hamada N, Grigoryeva E S, et al. Risk of various types of cataracts in a cohort of Mayak workers following chronic occupational exposure to ionizing radiation[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2018, 33(12): 1193-1204 [7] Little M P, Kitahara C M, Cahoon E K, et al. Occupational radiation exposure and risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2018, 33(12): 1179-1191 [8] Struelens L, Dabin J, Carinou E, et al. Radiation-induced Lens opacities among interventional cardiologists: retrospective assessment of cumulative eye Lens doses[J]. Radiat Res, 2018, 189(4): 399-408 [9] 秦永春, 王进, 朱晓敏, 等. 使用新旧标准估算一例白内障患者的眼晶体剂量[J]. 中国辐射卫生,2019,28(1):1-3 [10] Puell M C, Pérez-Carrasco M J, Palomo Alvarez C. Macular thickness and mesopic visual acuity in healthy older subjects[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2019, 44(1): 82-88 [11] Puell M C, Palomo-Álvarez C, Pérez-Carrasco M J. Macular inner retinal layer thickness in relation to photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity in healthy young and older subjects[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018, 59(13): 5487-5493 [12] 王韫智, 郑志. 光相干断层扫描联合微视野检查在糖尿病黄斑水肿中的应用研究进展[J]. 中华眼底病杂志,2018,34(4):404-407 [13] Barak Y, Ihnen M A, Schaal S. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis and management of vitreoretinal interface pathologies[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2012, 2012: 876472 [14] Jaillet C, Morelle W, Slomianny M C, et al. Radiation-induced changes in the glycome of endothelial cells with functional consequences[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 5290 [15] Seregard S, Pelayes D E, Singh A D. Radiation therapy: posterior segment complications[J]. Dev Ophthalmol, 2013, 52: 114-123 [16] Nakamura S, Chichibu S. Introduction to Nitride Semiconductor Blue Lasers and Light Emitting Diodes[M]. Florida: CRC Press, 2000. [17] Nakamura S. Present performance of InGaN-based blue/green/yellow LEDs[J]. Light-Emitting Diodes: 1997, 3002(1): 26-35 [18] Zhao Z C, Zhou Y, Tan G, et al. Research progress about the effect and prevention of blue light on eyes[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2018, 11(12): 1999-2003 [19] Kim G H, Kim H I, Paik S S, et al. Functional and morphological evaluation of blue light-emitting diode-induced retinal degeneration in mice[J]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Fur Klinische Und Exp Ophthalmol, 2016, 254(4): 705-716 [20] Nakamura M, Kuse Y, Tsuruma K, et al. The involvement of the oxidative stress in murine blue LED light-induced retinal damage model[J]. Biol Pharm Bull, 2017, 40(8): 1219-1225 [21] Noell W K, Walker V S, Kang B S, et al. Retinal damage by light in rats[J]. Invest Ophthalmol, 1966, 5(5): 450-473 [22] Ham W T Jr, Mueller H A, Ruffolo J J Jr, et al. Sensitivity of the Retina to radiation damage as a function of wavelength[J]. Photochem Photobiol, 1979, 29(4): 735-743 [23] Vicente-Tejedor J, Marchena M, Ramírez L, et al. Removal of the blue component of light significantly decreases retinal damage after high intensity exposure[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0194218 [24] Youn T S, Lavin P, Patrylo M, et al. Current treatment of central retinal artery occlusion: a national survey[J]. J Neurol, 2018, 265(2): 330-335 [25] Butler F K, Hagan C, van Hoesen K, et al. Management of central retinal artery occlusion following successful hyperbaric oxygen therapy: case report[J]. Undersea Hyperb Med, 2018, 45(1): 101-107 [26] Clarke A K, Cozzi M, Imray C H E, et al. Analysis of retinal segmentation changes at high altitude with and without acetazolamide[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2019, 60(1): 36-40 [27] Gok M, Ozer M A, Ozen S, et al. The evaluation of retinal and choroidal structural changes by optical coherence tomography in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2018, 43(1): 116-121 [28] de Aguiar Remigio M C, Brandt C T, Santos C C, et al. Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease[J]. Eye (Lond), 2015, 29(4): 465-468 [29] García-Portilla M P, García-Álvarez L, de la Fuente-Tomás L, et al. Could structural changes in the retinal layers be a new biomarker of mental disorders? A systematic review and thematic synthesis[J]. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment, 2019, 12(2): 116-129 [30] Ferro Desideri L, Barra F, Skhiri M I, et al. Methodological concerns on retinal thickness evaluation by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in patients with major depressive disorder[J]. J Affect Disord, 2018, 238: 226-227 [31] Sönmez İ, Köşger F, Aykan Ü. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with major depressive disorder[J]. Noro Psikiyatr Ars, 2017, 54(1): 62-66 [32] Ashraf H, Nowroozzadeh M H. Diurnal variation of retinal thickness in healthy subjects[J]. Optom Vis Sci, 2014, 91(6): 615-623 [33] Jonas J B, Xu L, Wei W B, et al. Retinal thickness and axial length[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2016, 57(4): 1791 [34] Dervişoğulları M S, Totan Y, Tenlik A, et al. Effect of smoking on Retina nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer complex[J]. Cutan Ocul Toxicol, 2015, 34(4): 282-285
|
|
|
|